Free scan
2 sampled model responses, at most
Free
Potential discrepancy - machine extracted
- Pricing claims compared with your first-party facts
- Prompt, platform, model, locale and time on every observation
- No account needed
AI pricing accuracy
Compare sampled AI pricing claims with your first-party sources.
Assistant excerpt · Perplexity · sonar
“2.9% + $0.30 per successful transaction”
Assistant claim for online domestic card payments, in USD.
First-party fact · stripe.com/pricing
No comparable first-party price was pinned for this claim.
Every finding keeps the evidence behind it, so your team can check it before acting on it.
The exact words in the sampled answer, with the prompt, platform, locale and time.
The fact from your own pricing page that the claim was compared with.
Where the fact came from and when it was read, in UTC.
What kind of difference it is: a value, a plan, a currency, a billing period or a region.
How much the difference could mislead a buyer, from 1 to 4. A wrong main plan price is 4.
Potential until a person reviews it. Confirmed only in the human-reviewed audit.
Recorded 2 Oct 2026: two sampled responses. The pricing source was localized in German. An unsupported comparison is not a confirmed pricing error.
The product, explained
See how a provisional scan leads to a human-reviewed audit and correction drafts.
66-second overview
What does AI tell buyers about your pricing? A confident answer can still miss a billing condition, quote an old plan, or compare the wrong unit. That changes the comparison before a buyer even reaches your website.
To respond, you need to see the answer and the evidence behind it. QuotedWrong samples AI answers about your pricing, then compares the claims with your own pricing page.
A free scan flags potential discrepancies. A human-reviewed audit checks the findings, with source evidence, priorities and correction drafts. See what needs attention, understand the missing context, and decide what to clarify.
An audit gives you evidence, not control over an AI answer. See what AI says about your pricing. Start your free scan at quotedwrong.com.
Each step raises what a finding is allowed to claim.
Potential discrepancy - machine extracted
Enter your domain. We sample up to two model responses and compare the pricing claims in them with your first-party facts.
Confirmed discrepancy - human-reviewed
A person reviews 28 planned responses from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, across seven question categories, against your first-party sources.
Draft correction brief - approval required
You get prioritized fixes and draft correction briefs. Nothing is sent to a platform, publisher or public channel without your approval.
VerifiedPricing publishes checked pricing records, ordered separately
Start with a free signal. Order the audit when you need a finding a person has checked.
2 sampled model responses, at most
Free
Potential discrepancy - machine extracted
28 planned responses across 4 assistants and 7 question categories
Confirmed discrepancy - human-reviewed
No subscription. No monitoring. Checkout shows one price in your currency.
Fictional sample - not a customer audit
Explore a fictional pricing comparison. Switch from Price to Billing to see why the billing period matters, then inspect the Trial example.
Open the illustrative sample report. It shows the report format, not a completed customer audit or a live scan result.
Read results by assistant. This fictional sample plans seven responses per assistant, 28 in total. Every count states its denominator; these are not assistant rankings.
Review the scope and limits before deciding whether to order a human-reviewed audit.
The recording uses a local demonstration of the interface. No live scan, real discrepancy, purchase or paid delivery is shown.
Report walkthrough
Explore the comparison and the sample report in 30 seconds.
We report what a sampled answer stated, not why.
No one can promise an assistant will change what it says.
Findings cover the stated sample, assistants, market and dates only.
We do not determine negligence, liability or platform-policy violations.
Practical guides for clearer pricing:
On their own, not much, and the result says so. Every observation is dated and scoped, and free findings are labeled potential. The audit reviews 28 planned responses across four assistants and seven question categories.
No. There is no score. You see the exact excerpt, the source the assistant cited, and the first-party fact it was compared with.
No one can promise that, and we do not. You get prioritized fixes and draft correction briefs. Nothing is sent without your approval.
One human-reviewed audit for one company or domain, in one country and language: 28 planned responses from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, and a report with source evidence, dated observations and prioritized corrections. The sample report shows the format before you order.
Scan results are not listed or indexed. Anyone with the result link can open it, and a new scan of the same domain reuses the result until the date shown on it. Results cover only public pricing information. Correction briefs are drafts for your review.
From the assistants' provider APIs, at a recorded time and locale. They are sampled answers, not rankings of the consumer apps and not the answer every user sees.
Free scan with up to two sampled model responses. No account needed.
Free scan · your domain